topics discussed included: the differences and similarities between devsecop and devops; the role of a platform in relation to system security; and the value of threat modelling. but it does suggest that minimizing documentation is a good thing, and that designers ought to be seeking to communicate design decisions with the least amount of work possible. documentation becomes part of the development process, not a separate activity. right-sizing as mario described is a response to the large amounts of documents that software projects had or have: right-sizing means that the level of effort applied to write and maintain the documentation plus the value of that written document should have a greater return on investment (roi), then not having that information readily available (i.e., the effort it would take reconstruct the information and impact of not having that information for current decisions).
some of us went to school 30 years ago and may not have worked in this area. unfortunately what developers think you should “get it”, turns out in a lot of cases to not be intuitive for the user. even if word documents are there for requirements and design, people will generally have a tough time identifying what a particular function or line of code of interest, maps to in the requirements or design documents. the generated documentation can always be in a format like word or pdf format, for any analysis/reviews that need to be conducted abstracted out from actual lines of code.
topics discussed included: the differences and similarities between devsecop and devops; the role of a platform in relation to system security; and the value of threat modelling. the adoption of agile methodologies in project management and software development has experienced a rapid growth in the last decade and is expected to keep growing. in transitioning to the agile way of working, many johns and janes throughout the world pose the same questions on what appears to be such a loose approach to development and is definitively a different, less traditional way of doing things. in order to avoid wasting time, documentation in agile should occur only when it is necessary.
documentation should be available as the project rolls along and in a permanently updated support, available to the target audience of that documentation. at this point, it should move from the product backlog – the set of items describing features to implement in the sprints – into the product increment – the set of product backlog items completed during a sprint and all previous sprints. among all the questions and doubts that arise from this change in the way teams work and especially on the mindset change it implies, documentation is a major issue, being one of the strongest changes – from documenting everything before starting to develop, to documenting almost nothing in that very same phase. but it reminds teams that the focus should always be on delivering value to the customer. view an example a virtual conference for senior software engineers and architects on the trends, best practices and solutions leveraged by the world’s most innovative software shops.
he described an approach on documentation which he called “emergent documentation”: (…) we do not documentation in agile is “living” and needs to be collaboratively maintained by the whole team. to make the most of the the traditional approach to documentation is being challenged. in the waterfall methodology, a lot of time is spent on, agile documentation examples, agile documentation examples, agile documentation types, types of documentation for agile projects, agile documentation checklist. agile documentation is an approach to create concise documents that serve the situation at hand. the documentation should be as efficient as possible in a way it achieves relevant goals in agile software development projects.
believe it or not, an agile approach to documentation can address all these problems—but only if the whole agile team document stable things, not speculative things. take an evolutionary approach to documentation development, seeking view full document interactionsthe agile approach to documentation is:-do the necessary documentation to support, agile documentation templates, the agile approach to documentation is tcs, emergent documentation agile, agile document control, agile just enough documentation, agile methodology, waterfall documentation vs agile documentation, deviation from standard agile processes are documented in
When you search for the agile approach of documentation, you may look for related areas such as agile documentation examples, agile documentation types, types of documentation for agile projects, agile documentation checklist, agile documentation templates, the agile approach to documentation is tcs, emergent documentation agile, agile document control, agile just enough documentation, agile methodology, waterfall documentation vs agile documentation, deviation from standard agile processes are documented in.